Login



Other Articles by Author(s)

Hajer Jmii
Asma Meddeb
Souad Chebbi



Author(s) and WSEAS

Hajer Jmii
Asma Meddeb
Souad Chebbi


WSEAS Transactions on Power Systems


Print ISSN: 1790-5060
E-ISSN: 2224-350X

Volume 12, 2017

Notice: As of 2014 and for the forthcoming years, the publication frequency/periodicity of WSEAS Journals is adapted to the 'continuously updated' model. What this means is that instead of being separated into issues, new papers will be added on a continuous basis, allowing a more regular flow and shorter publication times. The papers will appear in reverse order, therefore the most recent one will be on top.



Voltage Contingency Ranking for IEEE 39-Bus System using Newton-Raphson Method

AUTHORS: Hajer Jmii, Asma Meddeb, Souad Chebbi

Download as PDF

ABSTRACT: Steady state security assessment becomes a stringent need as it provides the knowledge about the state of the system following a contingency. This paper presents a Newton-Raphson load flow based method for voltage security assessment. A voltage performance index is computed firstly to classify contingencies in secure, insecure and critical classes and then to rank them in the decreased order of severity. The proposed approach is tested on the IEEE 39-bus system by performing (N-1) contingency for different load conditions.

KEYWORDS: Classification, load flow, Newton-Raphson, (N-1) contingency, performance index, steady state security assessment.

REFERENCES:

[1] E.Ciapessoni, D.Cirio, S.Massucco, A.Morini, A.Pitto and F.Silvestro, “Risk-Based Dynamic Security Assessment for Power System Operation and Operational Planning,” Energies journal, 2017.

[2] A.Sharifian, and S.Sharifian, “A new power system transient stability assessment method based on Type-2 fuzzy neural network estimation,” Electrical Power and Energy Systems, pp. 71-87, 2015.

[3] M. Di Santo, N. Ranaldo, D.Villacci, and E. Zimeo, “Performing Security Analysis of Large Scale Power Systems with a Broker-based Computational Grid,” International Conference on Information Technology, 2004.

[4] K.Sh.Swarup, “Artificial neural network using pattern recognition for security assessment and analysis,” Science Direct, pp 983-998, 2008.

[5] D. Devaraj, J. P. Roselyn, and R. U. Rani, “Artificial neural network model for voltage security based contingency ranking,” Science Direct, pp 722-727, 2007

[6] N. Amjady, “Dynamic voltage security assessment by a neural network based method,” Electric Power Systems Research, pp 215-226, 2003.

[7] K.Saini, and A.Saxena, “Online Power System Contingency Screening and Ranking Methods using Radial Basis Neural Networks,” International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Research, vol. 6, issue 3, pp 9-16, 2016. Table 4 Contingency Ranking for 5 Operating Conditions Base case 10% 30% 50% 70% Rank Line PI Rank Line PI Rank Line PI Rank Line PI Rank Line PI 1 8-5 0.9467 1 6-5 0.9206 1 8-5 8-7 9-8 0.9502 1 9-8 0.9997 1 14-15 0.9883 2 8-7 0.9465 2 6-31 7-6 0.8878 2 6-5 0.9283 2 8-7 0.9760 2 8-5 8-7 9-8 0.9365 3 9-8 0.9225 3 9-8 8-5 8-7 0.8706 3 7-6 6-31 0.8965 3 8-5 0.9599 3 6-5 0.8582 4 6-5 0.9037 4 5-4 0.7347 4 14-15 0.8063 4 14-15 0.9270 4 6-31 7-6 0.8083 5 6-31 7-6 0.8597 5 4-14 0.7303 5 4-14 13-14 0.7844 5 6-5 0.9079 5 5-4 0.7727 6 5-4 0.7299 6 13-14 0.7017 6 5-4 0.7441 6 7-6 6-31 0.8594 6 13-14 0.7012 7 13-14 4-14 0.6928 7 14-15 0.7013 7 6-11 0.6788 7 13-14 4-14 0.8128 7 4-14 0.7004 8 14-15 0.6344 8 11-10 0.6396 8 11-10 0.6759 8 5-4 0.7118 8 15-16 16-19 16-24 0.6949 9 6-11 0.5991 9 6-11 0.6318 9 15-16 16-19 16-24 0.6357 9 15-16 16-19 16-24 0.6660 9 16-17 0.6264 10 11-10 0.5934 10 16-24 15-16 0.5805 10 10-13 0.6008 10 11-10 0.6571 10 18-17 0.6261

[8] T.Jain, L.Srivastava, and SN.Singh, “Fast Voltage Contingency Screening using Radial Basis Function Neural Network,” IEEE transactions on power systems, vol. 18, 2003.

[9] W.A.Oyekanmi, G.Radman and T.O.Ajewole, “Transient stability based dynamic security assessment indices,” Electrical & Electronic Engineering, 2017.

[10] P.Sekhar, and S.Mohanty, “Power system contingency ranking using Newton Raphson load flow method,” IEEE India Conference, 2013

[11] S. Burada, D. Joshi, and K.D. Mistry, “Contingency Analysis of Power System by using Voltage and Active Power Performance Index,” 1st IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Intelligent Control and Energy Systems, 2016.

[12] S.r. Gongada ,T.S. Rao, P.Mallikarjuna rao, S. Salima, “Power System Contingency Ranking using Fast Decoupled Load Flow Method,” International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques, 2016.

[13] A. Meddeb, H. Jmii, and S. Chebbi, “Heuristic analysis and contingencies classification of case Study IEEE 14-bus,” 7th International Conference on Sciences of Electronics, Technologies of Information and Telecommunications (SETIT), pp 128–133, 2017.

[14] L. Srivastava, S.N. Singh, and J. Sharma, “A hybrid neural network model for fast voltage contingency screening and ranking,” Electrical Power and Energy Systems, pp 35–42, 2000.

[15] O.A. Afolabi, W.H. Ali, P.Cofie, J.Fuller, P.Obiomon, and E.S. Kolawole, “Analysis of the Load Flow Problem in Power System Planning Studies,” Energy and Power Engineering, pp 509-523, 2015.

[16] T. Kulworawanichpong, “Simplified Newton– Raphson power-flow solution method,” Electrical Power and Energy Systems, pp 551– 558, 2010.

[17] X.-F. Wang et al., “Modern Power Systems Analysis,” Springer Science and Business Media, 2008

[18] L.Lenoir, “Automatic Operator of Electrical Network,” Phd. thesis, Univ. Quebec, June 2009.

WSEAS Transactions on Power Systems, ISSN / E-ISSN: 1790-5060 / 2224-350X, Volume 12, 2017, Art. #29, pp. 248-253


Copyright © 2017 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

Bulletin Board

Currently:

The editorial board is accepting papers.


WSEAS Main Site